Prediction of Naomi Osaka [55th] vs Coco Vandeweghe [815th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
L L L W L W W L L LHead To Head: Osaka 1 - 0 Vandeweghe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Osaka winning 2 and Vandeweghe winning 1. The last match between Osaka and Vandeweghe was at the U.S. Open - New York, 29-08-2016, First, Hard with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 1 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | 0 |
| Osaka | Stats | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (9-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 55 | Ranking | 815 |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 9 |
| 27 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 5 |
| 64% (315-177) | Career Total W/L | 52% (308-281) |
| $22,222,319 | Career Prize Money | $4,045,196 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Osaka VS Vandeweghe H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Naomi Osaka
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
44%
(
47 of
108)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
8
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Osaka VS Vandeweghe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:25:0 | Average Match Time | 2:25:0 |
| 52% (47/91) | 1st Serve % | 44% (47/108) |
| 85% (40/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (37/47) |
| 50% (22/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (32/61) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 36% (39/108) | Return Points Win % | 32% (29/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naomi Osaka vs Coco Vandeweghe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Osaka 1 - 0 Vandeweghe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Osaka has won 46.15% of points on their second serve, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Osaka, in recent form, has won 45.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Osaka has saved 55.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandeweghe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Osaka has won 58.97% of matches played (W/L 23/ 16), with Vandeweghe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Osaka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 218/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17). Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Osaka has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7), where as Vandeweghe has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Osaka winning 1 times and Vandeweghe being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Osaka winning 2 and Vandeweghe winning 1. The last match between Osaka and Vandeweghe was at the U.S. Open - New York, 29-08-2016, First, Hard with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Osaka and Vandeweghe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Osaka winning 1 times and Vandeweghe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Osaka winning 0, and Vandeweghe 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Osaka has played against opponents with an average rank of 105.41 while Vandeweghe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Osaka has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandeweghe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Osaka has converted 31.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandeweghe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Naomi Osaka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Hailey Baptiste
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
118)
13
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Naomi Osaka
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Naomi Osaka
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Karolina Muchova
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Naomi Osaka
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
34
|
4-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Alycia Parks
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Osaka vs Vandeweghe?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Osaka Vs Vandeweghe is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (315/177) | Win/Loss | 52% (308/281) |
| 61% (680/442) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (702/635) |
| 55% (5659/4715) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6388/6195) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 2107 | Aces Total | 2782 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 864 | Total Double Faults | 2241 |
| 1:6:44 | Average Match Time | 1:12:4 |
| 116.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 109.25 |
| 56% (13778/24498) | 1st Serve % | 54% (16939/31631) |
| 72% (9856/13778) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11991/16939) |
| 48% (5198/10719) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6985/14692) |
| 45% (1244/2748) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1407/3282) |
| 42% (10389/24470) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13180/32476) |
| 65% (312/480) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (301/566) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 51% (56/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (81/161) |
| 66% (96/146) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (84/172) |
| 91% (292/266) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (320/264) |
| 9% (292/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (320/52) |
| 25% (200/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (269/43) |
See recent tennis photos of Osaka and Vandeweghe
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
